Why do people who seek a criminal investigation into the attacks of 9/11 connect a liberal bias?

Would it not be logical to present facts with indifference?





I personally hold many Conservative values and vote primarily republican. Dose this mean that I think my party is infallible? No, but I believe what happened, and what is happening go's far beyond that of party lines.


It is difficult to question something that you have previously accepted as fact. Once an event or philosophy is excepted and embraced, it is very difficult to go back and say. Everything I know and thought could be wrong. Most of us simply choose not to look at things that jeopardize the foundation of our being, for fear that we must then change...Why do people who seek a criminal investigation into the attacks of 9/11 connect a liberal bias?
I think people assume that a political agenda is involved when people start asking questions about 9/11, since many are keen to blame it on the government. Therefore, many critics of the conspiracy theory deduce that someone who is anti-George Bush administration is anti-everything Republican, which is a poorly weighted equation.Why do people who seek a criminal investigation into the attacks of 9/11 connect a liberal bias?
Thank you for your opinion. I feel much the same way. Being Mormon and Conservative, I get a lot of crap from people about politics. :)
I call this the ';tin foil hat'; syndrome.





When you hold an opinion, you get lumped into the same group as other people who hold that opinion.





I always had an issue with the way Waco was handled. When that puke McVeigh (may he rot) blew up the Federal building, I got lumped in with his crowd.





I just felt it should have been handled a little more low key, But


overnight I went from being a communist to being a right-wing nut job.





Be careful, some of those loonies can be very convincing. And whatever you do, don't take off the ';tin foil hat';, that's keeps ';them'; from reading your mind. :)
liberal are willing to question corruption, it seems cons have more faith in their leaders, i think from religious affiliation they trust them,,,
what you say is so true. it is so hard for people to admit they might have been wrong. it takes a strong person to admit they were wrong about somthing. myself, i was so tired of hearing people talk about 911 being a inside job. i thought there was no way it could be true. and let me tell you, im a person with some inside knowledge of mena arkansas, so i know all about the corruption government is capeable of. so i started to research what was being said. today it as clear as anything to me that in fact 9/11 was a inside job. i bacame convinced three years ago, im still learning new facts every day. im convinced that anyone who honestly wants to know the truth can figure it out if they are willing to take the time to do the research. even dumb people can figure this stuff out. here are some good starter links for any seeking the truth about 9/11
1. Because the bad guys in the 911 conspiracy theories are all Republicans.


2. Charlie Sheen.


3. Rosie O'Donnell.





'Nuff said.
You and I are obviously on the same page but foreveryone else, calling people ';liberals'; or ';tin foil hat'; wearers is simply a tactic of disinformation.





This is a common technique used by FOX, and Bill O'Reilly and Michael Savage types. The reason it is so effective is because people are fearful of being publicly ridiculed or being lumped in with a group that is politically unfavorable, be it left or right. This allows someone to not have to address difficult questions for which they have no answers to anyways. Read more on disinfo here:








http://911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinfo鈥?/a>
They're called followers/sheep. ;-(=
Are you saying all people wanting to investigate what happened on 911 are liberals? Maybe whoever it is just wants a fair examination of what was done and not done by both administrations to protect national security.


I personally think 911 happened because Congress tied up the entire government for over a year with the Monical Lewinsky debacle when they should have been doing their job which is to run the government and protect its citizens, not peer through peoples keyholes (but that's just me).


Then again, Clinton had the chance to kill Bin Laden and didn't, so maybe he does have some responsibility.


It's probably a nutjob fringe group you're talking about and it's not fair to paint all Democracts or Liberals with that brush. Republicans have just as loudly accused the Clinton administration of being guilty of not preventing it, so I think this is a two way street!